He won the election before he lost it?
I've long hoped (well for four years if that's long enough) that this election would produce a clear winner so that we can put this stolen election crap behind us. For the third time in the last 10 days Bush has approached or exceeded 49% in Rasmussens daily tracking polls, but each time before he's slid back. It's a tough call -- would I prefer an outright Kerry victory to one that is close enough for the Democrats to cry foul? I don't think the answer is yes, but it doesn't make me feel much better.
But the problem may be that the election has already been stolen -- which is to say -- if you're supposed to win and don't, what other explanation is there? I don't know who'll win the election, but I've got a problem with the notion that Kerry won the election before he lost it.
Comments
What's interesting to me is that the Dems are seeing all these potential problems, but the GOP isn't. Could it be that the ones that are the perpetrators of the shennanigans are GOP guys, so they have no need to complain and/or be worried?
By the way, in the Goldberg article you cite, we have this: "will be prepared to name a national security team before knowing whether he's secured the presidency." Isn't this the very thing that W did in 2000? Just askin...
Posted by: Glenn | October 22, 2004 9:55 PM